plan |
![]() |
short history from the FU.NT report | ||||||
![]() |
to the message of the Federal Council | ||||||
![]() |
the SVC and the future of higher education | ||||||
![]() |
participation criteria and conditions for success | ||||||
![]() |
necessary involvment of several institutions | ||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
common software tools | ||||||
![]() |
support from home institutions | ||||||
![]() |
important date | ||||||
![]() |
conclusion |
| June 1996 | The SHK/CUS accepts the report of the working group "Distance Learning at the University level" |
| Autumn 1996 | Creation of the FU.NT expert group |
| March 1997 | FU.NT submits a research project to the 8th series of the NRP. The project is not accepted: research in this domain is not supported at the present time. |
| Juin 1997 | Following a FU.NT proposal , OFES and SHK/CUS support the creation of the national web site www.edutech.ch |
| October 1997 | The FU.NTreport is approved by the SHK/CUS on october 23rd, and submitted to the Federal Government for the preparation of the 2000-2003 plan. |
| November 1998 | Message of the Federal Council asking our parliaments for 30 millions francs in order to create the Swiss Virtual Campus |
plan |
141.23 Encouragement des nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication en vue de créer un Campus virtuel suisse
...
"propose un programme de développement des NTIC, permettant à la Suisse grâce à un effort conjoint de la Confédération et des hautes écoles de se placer au niveau des pays ayant déjà effectué cette conversion pédagogique.
Ce programme prône à la fois la compétition et la collaboration, les projets retenus étant présentés par un consortium de plusieurs hautes écoles."Les projets, dont le but est de fournir des modules d'enseignement à distance s'appuyant sur les NTIC, devront adhérer aux principes du "campus virtuel suisse" et répondre aux cinq critères suivants:
favoriser la coopération entre les hautes écoles (Universités, EPF, HES);
mettre en valeur un objectif pédagogique clair;
viser au développement d'outils communs sur des plates-formes stables;
présenter un plan de réalisation avec des critères d'évaluation; participer dès le début par une contribution indirecte de l'institution et prévoir l'intégration dans la planification courante au terme du projet.
plan |
||
plan |
||
plan |
||
necessary involvment of several institutions
most projects of the past have never gone beyond the prototype stage because funding stopped nobody else wanted to use them they did not correspond exactly to what potential partners were looking for the SVC wants to avoid such pitfalls by associating future users from the design stage to the final evaluation.
plan |
||
evaluation (and accreditation)
learning modules produced by the virtual campus will be evaluated by the original designers with the help of the students "debugging" the course by the distance institutions who signed the project from the beginning. They will also evaluate the amount of presential tutoring and of remote help they deem necessary. by the first institutions intending to let their students take the course for credit. once a remote institution accepts that its students take a SVC course for credit, the course will receive its SVC accreditation
plan |
||
pedagogical design
in order to evaluate properly if a learning module fulfill its goals, it's important to know what was in the design;
hopefully, the interdisciplinary team that will work on the design will have a somewhat new approach to the discipline, in particular with regards to interactivity
a module is interactive if it involves some problem solving skills from the user - more than clicking to see the next page.
plan |
||
plan |
||
common software tools
Some functions will be common to all projects. The SVC wants them fulfilled in a limited number of environments to ensure their long term adaptation to a changing technology.Basic requirements are described in another document.
They have to cover:
they may also offer help in
- student management
- course management
- support of evaluation
the "best" environments can be chosen only by consensus; a small working group will start gathering information and do some testing after July 1st
- the development of pedagogical material
- support of learners' activities
plan |
||
support from home institution
- To lead the effort to produce a complete course needs an existing infrastructure and a willingness of one's own institution to help with the problems of project management. Every contribution of the home institution can be counted for matching funds to reach the 30% required for universities (the rules for FIT and FHS could be different).
- In addition, the teams should have readily access to specialists of the pedagogy of using the NTIC, to specialists of screen design, of software development (they can be students) and some experience in testing their material.
- Partners will offer their time which will be counted and compensated for according to the same rules and their unvaluable expertise. Testing time and evaluation should be properly accounted for and budgeted accordingly.
plan |
||
| 1 juillet 1999 | meeting in BERN | |
| 7/8 octobre 1999 | vote final sur le plan 2000-2003 | |
| octobre 1999 | désignation du Comité de pilotage | |
| octobre 1999 | lancement du programme CVS | |
| 30 novembre 1999 | lettres d'intention et esquisse | |
| 29 février 2000 | dépôt des dossiers et présentation | |
| avril ou mai 2000 | approbation par la CUS de la sélection préparée par le CPCVS | |
| juin 2000 | démarrage de la première tranche de projets | |
| courant 2001 | préparation et sélection des dossiers de projets de la deuxième tranche | |
| janvier 2002 | démarrage de la deuxième tranche de projets | |
plan |
||